SANZC02
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Bob
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
- Threads
- 30
- Messages
- 5,328
- Reaction score
- 8,984
- Location
- California
- Vehicles
- Tesla Model S, LE - R1S
- Occupation
- Retired
My personal opinion is you would be fine with the 22s. I've had wheels with much less sidewall then these 22s (even when I was in Mass. now in SoCal) and never had a problem.Breaking a rim on the 22's has come up a number of times in this thread. Can someone explain this more to me?
I've run, what I'd consider, low profile tires on my cars for years and haven't had an issue (knocks wood). I just compared my current (non-stock) tires on my Model 3 to the 22"s I have specced on my R1S order and there is more sidewall in my future tire in absolute terms (5.4" vs 3.9") and relative terms (sidewall heigh/total height at 16% vs 14%). From the perspective of "more rubber = more protection" (?) this seems like a safer selection that what I'm currently doing. The counter to this would be weight. My current car is the heaviest I've had and is a hair over 4,000 lbs, and I believe the R1S is expected to be 5,500 to 6,000 in curb weight, so certainly a good deal heavier.
What I'm getting at is, does weight matter that much in this particular situation? Have the folks with bent rims been unlucky? Or have I just been really lucky with my experiences? Trying to get an idea of how much of my personal car/sedan experience will translate to my new SUV life the future.
The 22s are "tilt cast/flow formed" so it is a hybrid between cast and forged unless you are doing extreme off-roading I do not think you would have an issue even on those Boston roads.
I have the 22s configured on my R1S, they have slightly more sidewall than I currently have on the 20s on my Jeep GC.
Sponsored