MNLightning
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #16
Here in Minnesota our voltage is 208v not 240v
Sponsored
Announcing our new "CLUBS" section where you can join or create a Rivian club or group! You can use this new feature to conveniently plan and discuss local events, gatherings or other club/group related topics.
So we encourage you to join (or start) special-interest and regional-based Rivian clubs at: https://www.rivianforums.com/forum/group-categories/clubs-groups.1/
Possibly but probably not. If your building's wiring is 3 phase you will see 208 from pole to pole but 120V pole to neutral.Here in Minnesota our voltage is 208v not 240v
Are you on 3-phase instead of split phase?Here in Minnesota our voltage is 208v not 240v
Too many variables to give a straight answer. Are we talking about L2 or L3? Whatās the OAT? Are we both starting at 0% and plugged into the same charger? My original point was that calling the āmiles per hourā meaningless is a little short-sighted. When I talk to new EV or non-EV drivers, if I start to tell them how many Kwh I get at home, how much it costs per kwh or how many kWh I get while on a road trip, they look at me with a blank stare. I mentally convert for them, because thatās what most people understand. Itās not necessarily right or wrong, just the nature of the beast.So if i drive with a lead foot and get 270 miles / 100%, and you drive with a feather foot and get 315 miles / 100%, how do I compare your charge rate in miles per hour?
The battery is roughly 135kW. So at 11.5kW youāll see times of roughly 12 hours (+/- a bit because of loss to heat and vampire drain) to go from 0-100%. If you charged every night and drove 100 miles a day, you would likely only need 4-5 hours to be back to full every night (assuming 100 miles is roughly 1/3 of the pack or 45kW of energy).Thursday after finding my regular 50kw Shell Recharge station wasn't working. Shell reset it 3 times and still no luck so I headed to the fastest chargers within 30 miles at a Walmart. I was pretty happy with the charge rate. It took just over an hour to go from 10% to 93%. For a while the charge rate was adding over 500 mph.
Fast forward to today and I tried 3- 50Kw chargers 2 at Goodwills and what was my regular charger in Hopkins that either failed or crapped out. My 1st attempt charged me at 125 mph for just 30 minutes and stopped. The Shell rep said the chip in the handle was on a work order and should be repaired in about 2 weeks.
I'm going to have to move up my scheduled installation of my 11.5Kw home charger as without 50Kw charging available I can't really use the truck. I've been using the 120v 2mph home charger overnight when needed. Currently I'm down to 60 miles of range so the truck will have to sit tomorrow or until I get the 11.5Kw charger fired up.
Does anyone have experience with a 11.5kw charger? I'm just wondering what I can expect in terms of a charge rate. Hoping for 30mph
I drive xyz miles per day and don't see a reason for (me) to add the conversion of Kwh's into it. I know what a 50kw or 350kw charger will provide in MPH's. And Kwh and Mph are both just measures of the charge speed. So for me I'm just looking for the best estimate of time required to cover a distance in miles.Too many variables to give a straight answer. Are we talking about L2 or L3? Whatās the OAT? Are we both starting at 0% and plugged into the same charger? My original point was that calling the āmiles per hourā meaningless is a little short-sighted. When I talk to new EV or non-EV drivers, if I start to tell them how many Kwh I get at home, how much it costs per kwh or how many kWh I get while on a road trip, they look at me with a blank stare. I mentally convert for them, because thatās what most people understand. Itās not necessarily right or wrong, just the nature of the beast.
Three phase is 208 which is common in commercial. Minnesota houses are 240V split phase.Here in Minnesota our voltage is 208v not 240v
The issue is that kWh is the dependent variable and miles the independent variable. As such the kWh used depends on driving conditions which can't be predicted at the time the kWh are metered in. This is, among other reasons, why the cognoscenti deprecate the expression of consumption in mi/kWh and the representation of SoC in miles.The issue is mi / kwh is a dynamic number. So if you charge one week and tell someone you get 20 mph charge, and then there's crappy weather. The next week when you charge you may get 17 mph charge.
Residential service is normally 240V bi-phase (in North America). Panels are wired L1/N/L2 The exception will be residential buildings on farms with 3 phase service or apartments in large apartment buildings which are served with 3 phase Y in which case the panels are wired L1/N/L2 (or L2/N/L3 or L3/N/L1). The voltage difference between any L and any other L is 208V but the difference between any L and N is 120V.Three phase is 208 which is common in commercial. Minnesota houses are 240V split phase.
Public level 2 chargers may be three phase or split phase.
kw and kwh are not second nature to most people. Even this post "use kwh ... when telling other people how fast you are charging.".Please try to use kwh (or at least %) when attempting to compare numbers.
Miles is a meaningless statistics when trying to compare with other people or when telling other people how fast you are charging.
In my experience, who am I kidding I have no experience, I dont think many locals/providers will be servicing a house with 250V. Your more likely to 240 or less than 250v. And so, plan accordingly. If 48A gets 22 (rounded) mph of charge in the wild, that's really horrible and I''m hoping Rivian can do some software voodoo to improve efficiency.My guess is a either āmarketing roundingā or an absolute best-case theoretical scenario, including a āhotā grid or someone getting better-than-EPA estimate.
Nominal grid w/EPA estimate:
240V @ 48A = 11,520Wh / 480 W/mi = 24 mi/hr
Hot grid w/EPA estimate:
250V @ 48A = 12,000Wh / 480 W/mi = 25 mi/hr
Nominal grid w/Hyper-miler efficiency:
240V @ 48A = 11,520Wh / 460 W/mi = 25 mi/hr
IMO, I think it would be most fair to just advertise the EPA number on a ānominalā outlet. 24 mi/hr is not appreciably different than 25ā¦. But I guess that round number may be more desirable, to some?
It's even simpler as demonstrated by the first batch of reports: Efficiency, in Conserve, is around 2 mi/kWh average. Drive 100mi, you need to replace 50kW. I'm not even going to get into vampire drain, cooling/conditioning of battery while charging etc. As a rounded rule of thumb I'm planning on - miles driven/2 = kWh used; miles driven/20 = time to recharge to pre-trip level (assuming nothing drastic like going to 0 (speaking of which there is a 10% reserve right, so only 125kWh is useable? - really don't know). All just a general rule of thumb for charging off an L2 at 48Amps...I don't even want to go into an L1 since that may make me realize how horrible the efficiency is and not buy one - jk.The battery is roughly 135kW. So at 11.5kW youāll see times of roughly 12 hours (+/- a bit because of loss to heat and vampire drain) to go from 0-100%. If you charged every night and drove 100 miles a day, you would likely only need 4-5 hours to be back to full every night (assuming 100 miles is roughly 1/3 of the pack or 45kW of energy).