Search results

you do know how many test vehicles tesla has? It's in the thousands Right now they have manufactured well over 1000 cybercabs and they are driving them. Tesla even last year was rumored to have employed 700 test drivers in california alone The RDW tested for 1.5 years and they drove 1.8...

That's misleading,. There were two deaths from "FSD" but they were basically autopilot as FSD was in beta and they used autopilot on freeways. FSD switched to neural networks on highways with the more publicly available releases. That's when most of the FSD miles were racked up and nobody died...

There is zero evidence of a car in china with lidar preventing an accident that tesla would not prevent. In fact you see deadly accidents with chinese ADAS that have lidar. ones that tesla solved 4 years ago There is no evidence that with E2E neural network driving that lidar does anything...

Autopilot and FSD are not the same thing. Nobody has died from FSD which has crossed 12 billion miles. in fact, FSD improves safety which is why the RDW independently approved FSD in the netherlands It has been years since FSD has had a showstopping issue that was related to camera only...

my point is for unsupervised As I said, a light amount of supervision (recognizing this and not pressing the start FSD button) would prevent a scenario like this Tesla would also know the likelyhood of something like this happening and they would calculate risk with robotaxi

Go put a dummy under the tire of your car and start FSD. They're instantly dead That's my point. FSD has blind spots (bumper camera being one of them) and this is theoretically unsafe at scale Robotaxi software build does seem to use the bumper camera but not while driving. It only uses the...

FSD was approved in europe because the safety was independently verified. FSD v14 legitimately does improve safety with only light supervision FSD is extremely safe and with only light supervision that is more than enough to help the areas where FSD still struggles. For example, FSD does not...

It's both because Hw4.5 has 50% more CPU and 50% more ram. This is used for something. And besides, if memory bandwidth is a limitation, this will have safety implications on latency and what framerate of video you can process The problem with rivian building self driving from scratch is they...

Keep in mind tesla produces model Y robotaxi variants also in fremont What is actually different about robotaxi (compared to consumer FSD) is it appears tesla reboots the computer every single drive. This fixes some errors that FSD sometimes has We know this because someone mounted a camera in...

Also as mentioned many times, and people seem ignorant about is they only look at TOPS. Tesla HW4 FSD computer has almost double the memory bandwidth of the RAP1 computer and the new AI4.5 computer would theoretically have 50% more than that while also having 48gb of memory. RAP1 only has 36gb...

For unsupervised this is a problem. You can't have no camera cleaning and poor connectivity This is also required for level 4 because your car will never internally handle ever scenario

Are you going to spit nonsense again? Tesla has almost no safety monitor in any city and none of the rides in houston, dallas, or miami ever had a safety monitor. They only do a handful of safety monitor rides in austin to go on the freeway. It's all over X. HW4.5 is what the new cars have...

Insurance is not an issue. Accident rates will be known. If they are lower than manual driving then the costs will be similarly low. It's simple. FSD (unsupervised) will cost monthly. The monthly cost will include the cost of whatever it costs the car company to insure you. They will have to...

Tesla never sold an unsupervised product. The most egregious description of FSD back in 2017-2018 makes mention of someone in the driver's seat.

Tesla sold FSD as a product that drives in al most all circumstances with someone in the driver's seat. FSD v14 lite does this it is a full parking spot to parking spot functionality. It also has summon and soon banish Rivian promised hands free driving which they are unable to deliver

Yes. Considering he is making ignorant remarks after ignoring the fact that every robotaxi on earth has some kind of remote intervention.

Are you serious? have you been on that forum? This forum is the polar opposite. You can trash tesla all you want on that forum but all profanity is filtered out i'm not a member but reading stuff it seems like people there are generally less ignorant about the technology because it is more...

Yes exactly. Rivian did not promise a lot but what they did promise they could not deliver. The only lawyer who sued tesla individually used an argument that tesla did not disclose you needed a safety score to use FSD beta Before he sold his car, FSD beta required a safety score of 100. That...

You DON'T have to manually drive. A minimum risk maneuver is the car handling the behavior 100% autonomously Tesla puts up a "fake" message to give the illusion that the car is level 2 notice how the robotaxi build has the exact same failure but the message is turned off Are you stupid at...

Read the actual SAE J3016 document. It's not as simple as the chart makes it sound Tesla does not ask the supervisor to take over except for when the fake "red hands" error pops up. When that pops up, conveniently the car continues to drive and execute minimum risk manuevers. Robotaxi build...