Sponsored

Search results

  1. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    i mostly commute around town but will be taking some trips soon. Towing jetski’s and much hotter than 60F though.
  2. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    So let it be written, so let it be done, Just grabbed some new HTS60’s (275/60/20 116). First impressions is they are dead quiet and much nicer riding than the stock AT Pirellis. They look…fine. Not as cool as the AT’s but that’s the trade off. $922 out the door. Can’t be that.
  3. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    That’s really disappointing to hear. I wonder why efficiency is so poor relatively.
  4. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    B rating is UTQG. I get 2.1 ish on my stock 34” AT’s so I’m hoping to get more for the sake of longer trips. H rated shouldn’t mean much since the cars are top speed limited. Most of my driving is around town so not a big deal otherwise. The defenders are better looking IMO
  5. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    Defenders are my second choice but they’re B traction rated and Rivian Tracker shows 2.1mi/kwh efficiency which is a lot lower than the grabbers. What efficiency have you been seeing? They’re priced pretty well
  6. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    Could you post a few pics of them? I’m assuming you went 70 width? Mine is a commuter car that will tow a few times a year to the lake.
  7. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    Thanks for the input. To be fair I did address treadwear. Regarding UTQG; tread wear numbers are only reliable within a specific brand since it’s a self reported metric. Beyond that the grabbers are A traction rated and B temp rated (up to 115mph).
  8. Grabber HTS60 vs. all. Why not more popular?

    I need tire’s for my 20’s. Prioritizing efficiency. The General Grabber HTS 60 is tops on Rivian Tracker (https://riviantrackr.com/rivian-tire-guide/?size=275%2F60R20&sort=efficiencyGrade) and here...





Top