This language can only get Rivian so far. For example, they canāt say the car gets 400 miles per charge and then have it turn out that people can only get 200. This language usually addresses issues on the fringe.
My ford and Honda let me turn on only the fog lights. In fact, I just did this last week while up in the mountains skiing. Headlights were too bright, but fog lights were great.
Your 0.02 is worth just as much as mine! Maybe more! Totally fair to have a different take.
Iām pretty confident in my assessment though. Rivianās playbook is essentially undifferentiated from Teslaās. And they have very little opportunity to raise unrestricted cash for 4 years, but only have...
The issue with Rivian is still the same. They have a CEO who is following the Tesla playbook. But itās 2025 and not 2015.
Plus, Rivian has gained a reputation in key markets as having mediocre reliability with very long timelines for service.
Now demand is soft. Analysts are cutting price...
I dunno. Iāve curbed my wheels for years and never had an issue. Iāve also turned the steering wheel while stationary maybe 5000 times on a dozen cars without issue lol.
If you jammed the tired right close to the curb and then turned into it, it could be an issue. But damn, you would really...
yep and thatās how the market reacted, as predicted. People here call realists āhaters.ā But the reality is the numbers tell the story for a business like this. They did some excel spreadsheet math to make it seem like a profit. But they are going to sell less in 2025 than in 2024. Even their...
But thatās when the 3 was available. The question is, what were the growth numbers for the X/S when there was no 3/Y. Or better yet, what were the growth numbers for the X/S when the 3/Y was announced, but not yet available?
I donāt think that is correct. Wall Street expected growth so, meeting that expectation would not have been seen as crazy. Granted, the expected growth was modest. But thatās why the reduced forecast is surprising.