I’d suggest replacing it with a 20 year old beater until you learn how to drive. Maybe don’t post for the entire world to see that you’re a moron.
Did the gen 2s get that much of an increase? Gen 1s were all right around 1600lbs. It can handle more weight but it’s not designed for it or legal in many states.
Edit - a quick search says the gen 2s did in fact get a fairly significant increase in payload with the dual motor and smaller...
Shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that a truck can haul wood. It can’t do a lot of it with a small bed and low(ish) payload but there’s no reason to not make it work for a living.
It all depends on how large of a capacity battery pack you have. Unless you already have one it’s probably a lot cheaper to carry a small generator and a gas can or two.
They will price themselves right out of the market if they try and charge nearly $140k for a R1 tri/quad. It’s simply not built well enough or at a quality point to be worth anything close to that. At the current prices it’s very questionable and only slightly justifiable because there are so...
The R2 is about as much of an off-roader as a Jeep Renegade. It has some ground clearance and can manage some rough forest service roads but you aren’t rock crawling or doing serious trails in it. It’s built to suit an image that sells not for serious work.
I wouldn’t worry about it. The 3PMSF is a joke and solely there to market tires. All it means is that tire had 10% better traction during acceleration on snow than the standard tire and doesn’t test anything with braking, cornering, ice, etc.
It seems like a weird choice but I guess somewhere a bean counter weighed the slight cost savings of no radio hardware against the odds of reducing sales and the math worked out favorably for the company.